Every interview should outlast the hiring decision.

Most screening tools give you the same output on day 1 as day 1,000. Screenz connects interview answers to hiring outcomes, so the platform gets more accurate the longer you use it — not just faster.

Screenz connects with 65+ ATS platforms via API. Candidates receive an interview link automatically when they apply, and results — scores, transcripts, rankings — flow back into your ATS as notes. No workflow changes required.

One-way video tools give candidates preset questions and your team hours of footage to watch. Screenz is an adaptive AI conversation that probes follow-up questions and scores every answer in real time. You get a ranked shortlist, not a video queue.

95% of candidates complete the Screenz interview — higher than most human-led phone screens. The experience is conversational, structured, and respectful of candidates' time.

Every score is backed by transcript evidence and explicit reasoning your team can read and question. Screenz surfaces the signal — your team makes every final hiring decision.

No. Screenz ranks candidates and explains why. Every offer, rejection, and next step is made by your team. The AI handles the interview and the evidence; humans handle the decision.

The DOL puts the minimum cost of a bad hire at 30% of first-year salary — research puts the ceiling at 150%. For an $80K role, that's up to $120K+ in lost time, re-recruiting, and secondary turnover. Screenz typically pays for itself the first time it helps you avoid one bad hire.